An Arkansas mom found guilty of harassment charges for hacking into her son’s Facebook account. The teen who wants a no-contact order said his mother hacked his account, changed his password and posted slanderous, vulgar comments on his wall.

The woman, Denise New, who locked her son out of his Facebook account and posted her own items there was convicted Thursday of misdemeanor harassment and ordered not to have contact with the teenager.

Clark County District Judge Randy Hill ordered New, of Arkadelphia, to pay a $435 fine and complete anger-management and parenting classes. He said he would consider allowing her to see her 17-year-old son if she completes the two courses. Her son, Lane New who lives with his grandmother, who’s had custody of him for years.

The mother and son said she once had a good relationship but that it began to deteriorate this spring. She said the dispute that led to the Facebook postings arose when the boy was visiting. She had asked him to return a key to her home, which he declined to do, and she then refused to let him into the house to retrieve some of his belongings.

Some of the postings Denise New said she put on her son’s Facebook page included vulgarities. One, which she said she mistakenly posted on her son’s page instead of her own, said: “The only mistake I ever made was having a kid.”

Denise New, the 17-year-old’s mother, is outraged and believes she was within her legal rights to monitor her child.

New has admitted to changing the passwords, but claims he left his account logged in on her computer. She also admits to making several postings, but told authorities the rest of it was a “conversation” between her, her son, and his friends.

Todd Turner, a prosecutor on the case, defined Arkansas’ harassment law as forbidding a person from repeatedly committing acts that alarm or seriously annoy another person without good cause. Because of the son’s age he declined to go into any further detail reports

Hill gave Denise New a 30-day suspended jail sentence, which she would have to serve only if she did not fulfill the other conditions during her yearlong probation.

New has said she posted items on her son’s account after he had failed to log off the social-networking site. She also changed his password so he couldn’t use it again.

One of the Facebook messages Hill said he was disturbed by was worded to appear as though Lane New had written it: “Check this out — I went to my mom’s and deliberately started an argument and called the police on her. She almost went to jail. How cool is that? Ha, ha, ha.”

Denise New said she posted that item because she thought her son had told two police officers who came to her home that she had hit him during their confrontation. She said she had merely pushed her son back away from a door he was approaching

That posting, the judge said, could only be construed as an effort by the mother to make out her son to be a liar. Hill also criticized the mother for using vulgarities in messages left on her son’s cell-phone voicemail.

“You said you were trying to teach him a lesson,” the judge said to Denise New. “Were you trying to teach him it’s OK to use foul language? Nobody has the right to talk to anybody else like that.”

New had testified that the vulgarities she used in the Facebook postings and the cell-phone messages reflected the relaxed relationship she had once had with her son. Such language was common in everyday joking between the two of them, she said.

But the judge called it “totally, completely inappropriate.”

New’s attorney, Justin Hurst, said he would discuss a possible appeal with his client and decide whether to pursue one within the next few weeks.

She portrayed the matter as an effort by her to exercise supervision over her son’s Internet activities. “If I’m found guilty on this, it is going to be open season” on parents,” said Denise New.

In pronouncing judgment, Hill said that was clearly not the case. “The issue is: Did someone act in a way to harass or harm another person?” Hill said.